Moore v. the State.

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Moore's convictions, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting the YouTube gang videos or the mall surveillance videos, that any error was harmless, and that Moore failed to show ineffective assistance of counsel. The court applied the abuse‑of‑discretion standard to the authentication issue, plain‑error review to the unpreserved surveillance video issue, and the Strickland test for ineffective assistance.