Foreman v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Foreman’s convictions and sentences, holding that the evidence was legally sufficient, that the State did not violate due process by suppressing exculpatory evidence, and that counsel was not ineffective. The evidence included eyewitness identifications, DNA evidence, and Foreman’s confession, while the allegedly suppressed evidence was either disclosed, not shown to be favorable, or not material. The ineffective-assistance claim failed because Foreman did not establish what the proposed witness or photograph would have shown or how they would have changed the result.