Bowman v. the State.

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Bowman's convictions and sentences, holding that the evidence authorized the jury to find criminal intent, voluntary action, and failure to prove insanity by a preponderance of the evidence. The court deferred to the jury's resolution of conflicting expert testimony and found Bowman's challenge concerning the victim's law-enforcement status moot because the challenged counts were vacated or merged. No separate opinions were filed.