Snelson v. the State.

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of Snelson's motion for an out-of-time direct appeal from his guilty plea. It held that his newly asserted claims were not preserved, that claims previously rejected and not appealed were barred by res judicata, and that his remaining general counsel claims could not establish eligibility for an out-of-time appeal because they could not be resolved from the existing record. There were no separate opinions.