Lewis v. the State.

Summary

The court affirmed Lewis's convictions for malice murder and firearm possession, concluding that the trial evidence was legally sufficient and that the State's failure to disclose an interview summary did not violate due process. Even assuming the summary was favorable and unavailable, the court held that it was not material because it was unlikely to change the verdict in light of the extensive impeachment of the relevant witness and the other evidence identifying Lewis as the shooter.