Harris v. the State.

Summary

The court affirmed Harris's convictions and sentences, holding that he failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel. Counsel adequately elicited evidence concerning the victim's initial inability to identify the shooter, Harris offered no admissible evidentiary basis to show prejudice from the omitted questioning, and an objection to the detective's testimony would have been meritless because the testimony did not directly comment on the victim's credibility.