Green v. the State.

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Raymon Jamaal Green's convictions for malice murder, aggravated assault, armed robbery, and related offenses, finding the evidence sufficient to support each verdict. The Court also rejected Green's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, holding that any alleged deficiencies did not prejudice the outcome. The decision rested on de novo review of sufficiency and the Strickland test for counsel performance.