Davis v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Davis’s convictions and sentences, rejecting challenges to the cross-examination of his alibi witnesses, the absence of a limiting instruction, the admission of co-conspirator and identification-related testimony, and the effectiveness of trial counsel. The court held that the challenged evidence was admissible or, where the issue was unpreserved, that Davis failed to establish plain error or prejudice in light of the strong evidence of guilt.