Michael Levandoski, Petitioner v. State of Florida, Respondent. — Quince, J., Dissenting

Summary

Justice Quince dissents, arguing that the trial court’s failure to orally pronounce the specific special conditions of sex‑offender probation violated Levandoski’s due‑process rights and that, had the claim been timely raised, those conditions should be stricken. He agrees the claim is procedurally barred but maintains the oral‑pronouncement rule is mandatory.