Leshannon Jerome Shelly, Petitioner v. State of Florida, Respondent. — Lawson, J., Dissenting

Summary

Justice Lawson dissented, concluding that the court lacked express-and-direct conflict jurisdiction because the district court's decision did not conflict on its face with controlling precedent. He reasoned that the alleged conflict depended on facts outside the district court's opinion, involved an issue not decided below, and improperly treated a citation to federal precedent as creating jurisdiction. The dissent also maintained that the cited precedent did not establish an additional requirement that police remind a suspect of Miranda rights after reinitiation.