Daniel O. Conahan, Jr., Appellant v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Summary

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Daniel O. Conahan Jr.'s post‑conviction motions, holding that the Hurst error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and rejecting his Caldwell and chapter‑2017‑1 claims. Justice Quince dissented, arguing the harmless‑error analysis was speculative.