State of Florida, Petitioner v. Michael Lindsey McAdams, Responde — Polston, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting…

Summary

Justice Polston concurs with the majority that McAdams’ confession must be suppressed because he was in custody and not Mirandized, but dissents from the majority’s extension of Haliburton II to voluntary, non‑custodial interviews, arguing that due‑process protections apply only during custodial interrogation.