Otis D. Blaxton v. State of Florida — Pariente, J., Concurring

Summary

The concurrence agrees that the court should bar Blaxton from filing further pleadings unless they are submitted in good faith through counsel because of the volume and inadequacy of his pro se filings. It separately emphasizes a potential manifest-injustice claim arising from the possibility that Blaxton was unlawfully confined when he attempted to escape, and states that any such claim should be litigated in the trial court with attorney assistance.