Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 15-200 Re: John Patrick Contini – Revised Opinion

Summary

The court approved the Judicial Qualifications Commission's findings that Judge Contini committed multiple violations through an ex parte communication, failure to seek recusal or transfer while his division was effectively frozen, and uncivil courtroom conduct. Applying a clear-and-convincing-evidence review to the findings and independently reviewing the recommended discipline, the court concluded that a public reprimand, apology, mentoring, mental-health treatment, and costs were appropriate. The court also ordered Judge Contini to appear for administration of the reprimand.