Anthony Joseph Farina, Petitioner v. State of Florida, Respondent — Canady, J., Dissenting

Summary

In this dissent, Justice Canady argues that the Florida Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to review Farina’s petition because the underlying order is not final, that Rule 3.851 does not apply to Farina since he is not sentenced to death, and that Farina’s successive post‑conviction motion is insufficient on its face. Accordingly, the dissent would deny the petition and uphold the trial court’s dismissal.