Valerie Audiffred, Petitioner v. Thomas B. Arnold, Respondent — Canady, J., Dissenting

Summary

Justice Canady, dissenting, would dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction because the decisions relied on by the majority do not create an express and direct conflict. He reasoned that the reviewed proposal was treated as a joint proposal, while the proposals in the other decisions were treated as single-offeror proposals and therefore involved materially different controlling facts.