Oscar Ray Bolin, Jr., Appellant v. State of Florida, Appellee

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of Bolin’s successive postconviction motions, holding that neither the alleged confession by Steven Kasler nor proposed testimony concerning Michael Malone constituted sufficiently material newly discovered evidence. The court also rejected Bolin’s Brady claims because he failed to establish suppression, materiality, or prejudice, and held that the Governor’s warrant-selection discretion and the timing of Bolin’s warrant did not violate constitutional or due-process requirements. No separate opinions were filed.