J.r., Appellant v. Barbara Palmer

Summary

Justice Canady dissents from the majority, affirming that the Agency must petition the court to terminate an involuntary admission when statutory conditions are no longer met and that the annual support‑plan review must consider the least‑restrictive‑environment requirement; Justice Pariente joins that dissent, adding that the statute should be construed to uphold constitutional validity. Both dissenting opinions note that the majority’s refusal to address the constitutional question would render the statute facially unconstitutional.