The Florida Bar, Complainant v. Peter M. MacNamara, Respondent — Canady, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part

Summary

Justice Canady concurs with the majority that the referee’s findings of fact and the determination that MacNamara’s misconduct caused client harm are supported, but dissents from the majority’s imposition of a non‑rehabilitative suspension, arguing that the misconduct warrants at least a one‑year suspension.