Robert J. Bailey, Appellant v. State of Florida, Appellee

Summary

The Court affirmed the denial of Bailey’s amended postconviction motion, rejecting three ineffective-assistance claims. It held that counsel reasonably chose to retain the challenged juror, that the improper-voir-dire claim was procedurally barred, and that counsel’s reliance on expert mitigation evidence rather than family testimony was reasonable and caused no prejudice. No separate opinions were filed.