Robert Eugene Hendrix, Appellant v. State of Florida, Appellee

Summary

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Judicial Circuit’s denial of Robert Hendrix’s successive post‑conviction motion, holding that his claims of judicial bias, ineffective assistance, and Brady violations were procedurally barred, and that the court’s deadline limiting further motions was proper. The Court reasoned that each claim had been previously raised and rejected, and no new evidence was presented.