Dennis J. Dorsey v. Robert J. Reider — Canady, J., Dissenting

Summary

Justice Canady, dissenting, argues that the Florida Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to review the Third District Court’s decision in Reider v. Dorsey because the case does not expressly and directly conflict with the Court’s earlier decision in McCain v. Florida Power Corp. He maintains that the two cases are factually distinguishable and that the district court’s duty‑of‑care analysis correctly applied the “foreseeable zone of risk” test. Accordingly, he would discharge the case.