Florida Board of Bar Examiners Re B.u.u.

Summary

The Court disapproved the Board’s recommendation of conditional admission because Applicant had repeatedly failed to meet financial and tax obligations, lacked candor in her application, and had not established rehabilitation by clear and convincing evidence. It barred any further consideration of her admission application for three years. PARIENTE, J., dissenting, would have imposed a three-year period of conditional admission with strict monitoring instead of denying admission and delaying reapplication.