Daniel Delmonico v. Arthur Rodgers Traynor, Jr. — Canady, J., Dissenting

Summary

Justice Canady dissents, arguing that the Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction because the lower court decision does not expressly conflict with Levin and because the petitioners failed to preserve the qualified‑privilege issue for review. The dissent emphasizes that the majority reversed on an issue never raised in the district court, violating the structure of appellate review.