Anthony Mungin v. State of Florida

Summary

The Court affirmed the denial of Mungin's successive postconviction motion after an evidentiary hearing on his Brady and Giglio claims. It held that competent, substantial evidence supported findings that the State did not suppress Brown's account and that the prosecutor neither presented nor knowingly failed to correct false testimony. The Court also rejected cumulative-error relief and upheld denial of the disqualification motion because reliance on a prior adverse ruling was insufficient.