Andrew Michael Gosciminski v. State of Florida — Pariente, J., Concurring

Summary

Justice Pariente concurred in the result affirming the convictions and death sentence but disagreed with the majority's reasoning on the admissibility of threat testimony and the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the CCP aggravator. She concluded that the threat testimony should have been excluded as unfairly prejudicial, that the evidence supported a planned robbery rather than a planned murder, and that both errors were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. No separate opinions were provided.