The Florida Bar v. Miroslaw Thomas Lobasz — Pariente, J., Concurring

Summary

Justice Pariente concurs with the majority’s decision to disbar Lobasz but argues that the Bar’s failure to object to Lobasz’s mental‑health testimony constitutes a waiver of any discovery violation and that Florida Rule 1.280(e) imposes no duty to supplement interrogatory answers. The concurrence also rebukes the Bar for misrepresenting its objections during oral argument.