Jamie Lee Tasker v. State of Florida — Polston, J., Dissenting

Summary

Justice Polston dissents from the majority's conclusion that Tasker could challenge victim-injury points for the first time after probation was revoked. He would hold that the challenge was barred because the points appeared on the original scoresheet, Tasker failed to object at the original sentencing or later probation hearings, and the alleged error was not apparent on the face of the record. Chief Justice Canady, concurring, would uphold the majority's result because the scoresheet calculations did not become relevant until sentencing after revocation and Tasker then timely preserved the issue.