Jamie Lee Tasker v. State of Florida — Canady, J., Concurring

Summary

Chief Justice Canady concurs with the majority that Tasker’s claim that victim‑injury points were improperly included in his Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet may be raised for the first time in a timely Rule 3.800(b)(2) motion on appeal from the sentencing after his probation was revoked, and explains why the claim is not procedurally barred. The concurrence also recants the author’s earlier view in Stubbs. Justice Polston, dissenting, would have held the claim barred.