Dawn K. Roberts v. Corrine Brown — Polston, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part

Summary

Justice Polston partially concurs and partially dissents, agreeing that the Supreme Court should dismiss the single‑subject and ballot‑title claims but rejecting the majority’s view that the Court has exclusive jurisdiction over all other pre‑election challenges, arguing those issues are justiciable by the circuit court. Justice Quince, in a separate concurrence, agrees with the majority that only the single‑subject and ballot‑title issues are proper for striking the amendments and that other issues are premature.