Kibiro v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Kibiro’s convictions, holding that the Superior Court did not plainly err by failing to give an unrequested instruction under 11 Del. C. § 263 concerning circumstances in which reckless causation is not established. The Court reasoned that the actual result was within the risk created by Kibiro’s intoxicated, high-speed driving and that the other driver’s defensive maneuvers were foreseeable, materially distinguishing the circumstances presented here from those in the cited precedent. No separate opinions were filed.