Gieck v. State

Summary

The Court held that eligibility for discretionary expungement of pardoned convictions must be determined charge by charge, so the appellant’s pardoned aggravated-menacing and firearm-while-intoxicated convictions remained eligible even though his DUI conviction was not. The Court also rejected an all-or-nothing approach to expungement and remanded for the Superior Court to determine whether the appellant established manifest injustice as to the eligible convictions.