Tisinger v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed Tisinger's convictions and sentence after independently reviewing the record under Rule 26(c). It held that Tisinger failed to establish plain error from the alleged nondisclosure of a witness's identity and failed to show reversible error from the admission of the witness's out-of-court statements because the bench-trial judge stated that the statements would not be considered for their truth. The Court also found that counsel had conscientiously examined the record and that the appeal presented no arguably appealable issue.