Muniz-Rodriguez v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed Muniz-Rodriguez’s convictions after independently reviewing the record under the withdrawal procedure for appointed counsel. It concluded that his challenges concerning missing evidence, an uncalled witness and phone records, missing photographs, evidentiary sufficiency, and Spanish-language translation either were waived, unpreserved and failed plain-error review, or showed no reversible error. The Court found the appeal wholly without merit and granted counsel’s motion to withdraw as moot.