Mobley v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed Mobley's firearm convictions after reviewing the Superior Court's in camera examination of materials concerning an arresting officer's prior allegedly false statements. The Court held that the Superior Court appropriately exercised its discretion in determining the scope of the production and correctly concluded that no additional Brady material existed. The Court also held that Mobley had been able to impeach the officer with testimonial inconsistencies, leaving credibility for the jury.