McKnight v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed McKnight’s convictions and sentence after independently reviewing the record under the withdrawal procedure. It held that the surveillance videos were adequately authenticated despite the timestamp discrepancy and delayed download, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing a police officer with demonstrated familiarity with McKnight to identify him in certain videos. The Court concluded that the appeal was wholly without merit and granted counsel’s motion to withdraw as moot.