Massey v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Massey’s convictions, holding that the Superior Court properly excluded prior sexual-abuse allegations involving the victims and other family members because Massey presented no evidence that the allegations were false. The Court also held that the Superior Court did not abuse its discretion by allowing one child to testify while holding a stuffed animal, because the accommodation was justified, precautions were taken to limit prejudice, and no prejudice was shown.