Krafchick v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed the denial of Krafchick’s motion to correct an illegal sentence. It held that the jury-unanimity rule invoked by Krafchick did not apply because the aggravating factors supporting the upward departure from the sentencing guidelines did not increase the statutory sentencing range. The Court also rejected his due-process challenge to the sentencing guidelines, concluding that deviation from those guidelines alone does not create a constitutional or statutory right to appellate relief.