Gordon v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Gordon's conviction and probation-violation sentence, holding that his guilty plea to Act of Intimidation was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Gordon was aware that committing a new offense could violate his probation, acknowledged that fact on the Truth-In-Sentencing form and during the plea colloquy, and was represented at sentencing as facing both the new charge and the probation violation. The Court found no plain error in the Superior Court's acceptance of the plea.