Sharp v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Sharp’s convictions and sentence, holding that the trial court did not commit manifest error by refusing to remove Juror No. 8 for cause. The juror’s limited recollection of the case arose only after opening statements, and the trial judge adequately examined his prior exposure, credibility, and ability to remain impartial. The Court deferred to the trial judge’s assessment because that judge observed the juror firsthand.