Grimes v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed the denial of Russell Grimes's motion for reargument concerning his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The court held that the reargument motion was untimely and, alternatively, that Grimes could not relitigate his previously rejected double-jeopardy challenge to the indictment amendment. The court also applied abuse-of-discretion review to the Rule 35(a) ruling and de novo review to legal questions.