Willingham v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Willingham’s convictions and sentence, holding that the Superior Court properly declined to consider his pro se suppression motion while he was represented by counsel. Reviewing the unpreserved suppression and sufficiency claims for plain error, the Court found probable cause for the vehicle search, no plain error in the contemporaneous search of Willingham’s person, and sufficient evidence of constructive possession and firearm availability for the convictions. No separate opinions were filed.