Hartmann v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed the denial of Hartmann’s petitions for writs of habeas corpus and prohibition. It held that habeas relief was unavailable because Hartmann was detained under a valid sentence imposed after the Superior Court adjudicated a violation of probation, and that prohibition was unwarranted because the Superior Court had not exceeded its jurisdiction. The Court also denied attorney funds and deemed Hartmann’s motions for expedited review and in forma pauperis status moot.