Coleman v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed the judgment finding that Coleman violated his conditional release and probation and upheld the denial of his suppression motion. It held that Coleman waived his wiretap-disclosure claims by raising them too late, that the Superior Court properly denied his subpoena requests, that Probation and Parole substantially complied with the administrative-search procedure, and that the State was not required to disclose recordings it did not use at the violation hearing.