Rollins v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed the Superior Court’s denial of Rollins’s motion for sentence modification or reduction. It held that Rollins remained eligible for habitual-offender sentencing even though strangulation was not listed as a violent felony, and that his Rule 35(b) motion was untimely. The Court also held that relief under Section 4217 was unavailable because only the Department of Correction may initiate a sentence-modification application under that provision.