Grayson v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed the denial of Grayson's first motion for postconviction relief. It held that Grayson failed to establish ineffective assistance in connection with his suppression motion or guilty plea, that his sentencing-comparison claim was procedurally barred, and that he showed no good cause for obtaining transcripts and other documents at State expense. The Court also concluded that the guilty plea waived challenges to antecedent errors.