Scott v. Amisial

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed the judgment after concluding that the Superior Court properly limited the retrial to damages, excluded crash photographs without prejudicing Scott, allowed Amisial to introduce Scott's expert's deposition, and directed a verdict that Scott's negligence proximately caused Amisial's injuries. The court held that liability and damages were severable and that uncontradicted medical evidence supported at least a minimal damages award. The court also found no abuse of discretion in the challenged evidentiary rulings. No separate opinions were filed.