Pumphrey v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Pumphrey’s convictions for first-degree carjacking and first-degree robbery, concluding that the pretrial identification was not impermissibly suggestive, the alleged undisclosed evidence concerning another suspect did not establish a material Brady violation, and the vouching claim was affirmatively waived. The court vacated the offensive-touching conviction because the State conceded that it was a lesser-included offense of first-degree robbery. No separate opinions were filed.