Marsh v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed Nathaniel Marsh’s convictions and nine-year habitual-offender sentence after independently reviewing the record under Rule 26(c). The Court rejected his challenges to habitual-offender eligibility, the sufficiency of the burglary evidence, alleged prosecutorial misconduct, and the restitution order. It concluded that each claim lacked merit and that the appeal presented no arguably appealable issue.