Harris v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed Jordan Harris's convictions and sentence. It held that the challenged flight instruction was supported by the evidence, that the remaining instructional and evidentiary claims did not establish plain error, and that the trial court adequately addressed the juror issue and Harris's other appellate complaints. The court also concluded that Harris's pro se filings were not required to be considered while he was represented by counsel and that no continuance was warranted.